4/19/10

Apology for getting up on a soapbox last night.

Last night at book club we talked a bit about a woman in a book we all read (Zeitoun) who is Muslim and wears a headscarf. I'm afraid I may have kind of ranted at people while they were just trying to express their thoughts, so I wanted to share some resources/less heated thoughts:

1. Leila Ahmed is a respected scholar of Islam and Feminism. Here is a link to the chapter on veiling in her seminal work, "Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate", which is both essential and accessible reading on the topic.

2. Lawmakers in Belgium and Canada have been discussing limiting/banning the wearing of the veil. Here is an editorial critical of the Canadian law, and here is an editorial that supports a measure in Britain to ban the niqab.

3. Islam is a complex and diverse religion. Islamic law is based on the Koran (individual chapters of which are called sura) and the hadith, which are traditions about what the Prophet said or did during his lifetime. The hadith were passed down chains of oral transmission and traditionally, jurists (qadi) memorized hadith and their interpretations. To complicate matters, there is one major doctrinal split in Islam (Sunni or Shia; the debate is about how the authority to be the Caliph, or the Prophet's regent, is passed on) and some minor doctrinal splits (Twelver versus Seven Shiites, etc.) and different schools of law (4 major ones in Sunni Islam and lots of minor ones, which would affect how any qadi had learned to interpret specific sura and hadith) and different sects (Sufis, Kharijites, etc.) and syncretism with local traditions all over the world - so really, it is impossible to make any kind of blanket statement about what 'Islam' prescribes for women w/r/t clothing. There are almost as many versions of Islam as there are Muslims.

4. The sura that is most often cited as the basis for veiling charges believers (women and men) to behave modestly. Modesty is obviously a subjective matter. Ideally it would be up to any given believer to decide for him or herself (and only for him or herself) how to behave modestly.

5. There appears to be a relationship between being a majority Muslim place where women are not empowered (Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia) and being a place where women do not have a choice about veiling. I think mandatory veiling is a dependent variable and the important thing is advocating for women's right to education, to hold property, to vote, to run for office, to consent to marriage, etc. I think it is a distraction to talk about mandatory veiling (a symptom) rather than the rights that, fully exercised, will enable women to have meaningful choice about what modesty means for them as individuals.

3 comments:

  1. You beat me to the punch!

    Here were some resources I found

    Veiled intentions
     

    http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1209357939447&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayout

    http://www.cfr.org/publication/8034/

    ReplyDelete
  2. After reading more about Shari'ah Law, it is clear there are many different variations and uses of it depending on where you live or what you choose to practice. As a Muslim these laws affect many different aspects of your life, and the hijab is a small part of it. I definitely do not support the banning of religious garb, be it a hijab, a crucifix, or a yamaka. I also do not support enforcing the wearing of any type of religious garb, and while I agree that the hijab gets more attention than other human rights violations, I think it still stands as a symbol. I do not think a woman who chooses to wear a hijab is oppressed; I think a woman who does not have a choice is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. agreed, sorry i missed this conversation (or rant!!). It's about the choice which is also a dependent variable usually on economic status of a society and education. Education is not just of the women or oppressed group, but also of the men or oppressor group. Oppressors are also defined by the oppressed ie our accepted idea of men as hunters and women as gatherers (which has no scientific basis) means if a man doesn't "hunt" he isn't a man = if a man doesn't oppress women, he isn't a man and has no place in society just like a woman "asking to be raped" by not wearing a chador is also an outcast.

    ReplyDelete